4.8 Article

Adhesion contact dynamics of 3T3 fibroblasts on poly (lactide-co-glycolide acid) surface modified by photochemical immobilization of biomacromolecules

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 2566-2576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.039

关键词

adhesion contact dynamics; poly (lactide-co-glycolide acid) (PLGA); azide-chitosan; surface modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and effective method of biomacromolecule immobilization on biomaterial surface for direct tuning of biophysical parameters such as the initial cell deformation rate, degree of cell spreading and adhesion kinetics is important for tissue engineering. The photochemical immobilization of azide-chitosan (Az-CS) on poly (lactide-co-glycolide) acid (PLGA) is applied here. Chitosan immobilization on PLGA through the photoactive azide group further facilitates subsequent grafting of other biocompatible biornacromolecules like gelatin (Gel) through the active amine groups on CS. This study quantitatively compares the 3T3 fibroblast adhesion dynamics on three PLGA surfaces (Gel-CS-PLGA, CS-PLGA and unmodified PLGA surfaces) using Confocal-Reflectance Interference Contrast Microscopy (C-RICM) together with phase contrast imaging. CS-PLGA and Gel-CS-PLGA surfaces developed were confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy and water contact angle and cell adhesion contact dynamics measurements. The cell adhesion was strongest on the Gel-CS-PLGA surface and lowest on unmodified PLGA. The steady state adhesion energy by the cells on gelatin modified PLGA surface is determined as 4.0 x 10(-8) J/m(2) which is about 400 times higher than that on PLGA surface (1.1 x 10(-10) J/m(2)). Significantly increased cell adhesion with Gel-CS-PLGA is postulated to result in increased cell spreading. Our integrated biophysical method can quantify the transient contact dynamics and is sufficiently accurate to discriminate even between Gel and CS modified surfaces. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据