4.5 Article

Optical and physical properties of cobalt oxide films electrogenerated in bicarbonate aqueous media

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 110, 期 13, 页码 6871-6880

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp056689h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the first time, cobalt oxide films that are highly protective against localized corrosion and depicting a wide variety of bright and uniform colors due to light interference, have been successfully electrogenerated on polycrystalline cobalt disk electrodes tinder potentiostatic polarization in a mild aqueous bicarbonate medium. Open circuit potential measurements have shown the formation of a film with a bilayered structure, organized as a thin Co3O4 outer layer and a thick CoO inner layer. The existence of Co3O4 as a thin outer layer, previously postulated from galvanostatic reduction experiments, has been confirmed from XPS analysis. Raman spectroscopy, performed using a very low laser intensity, has shown that the films are mainly composed of CoO. The broadness of the Raman bands observed is associated to the amorphous character of the film, a result that has been confirmed by spectroscopic ellipsometry and X-ray diffraction analysis. Overall film thicknesses, well controlled by the anodization duration, were determined and correlated using mechanical (atomic force microscopy and profilometry) and spectroscopic (specular UV-vis-NIR reflectance and ellipsometry) techniques. Spectroscopic ellipsometry, using a simple amorphous dispersion model, has proved efficient for measuring thicknesses of films ranging from 31 to 290 nm with very low standard deviations. The real part of the complex refractive indices of these films, ranging from 1.8 to 2.2 (at lambda = 632.8 nm) depending on the anodization duration, is in good agreement with values reported in the literature for COO. The film with the highest refractive index, and consequently the more densely packed structure, was obtained following a 30-minute anodization period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据