4.7 Article

Infrared spectroscopy of symbiotic stars. IV. V2116 Ophiuchi/GX 1+4, the neutron star symbiotic

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 641, 期 1, 页码 479-487

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/500350

关键词

binaries : symbiotic; infrared : stars; stars : individual (V2116 Oph); stars : late-type

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have computed, using 17 infrared radial velocities, the first set of orbital elements for the M giant in the symbiotic binary V2116 Ophiuchi. The giant's companion is a neutron star, the bright X-ray source GX 1+4. We rule out the previously proposed period of 304 days and instead find an orbital period of 1161 days, by far the longest of any known X-ray binary. The orbit has a modest eccentricity of 0.10, with an orbital circularization time of less than or similar to 5 x 10(6) yr. The large mass function of the orbit significantly restricts the mass of the M giant. Adopting a neutron star mass of 1.35 M-circle dot, the maximum mass of the M giant is 1.22 M-circle dot, making it the less massive star. Spectrum synthesis analysis of several infrared spectral regions results in slightly subsolar abundances for most metals. Carbon and nitrogen are in the expected ratio resulting from the red-giant first dredge-up phase. The lack of O-17 suggests that the M giant has a mass less than 1.35 M-circle dot, consistent with our maximum mass. The surface gravity and maximummass of theMgiant result in a radius of 103 R-circle dot, much smaller than its estimated Roche lobe radius. Thus, the mass loss of the red giant is via a stellar wind. These properties argue that the M giant is near the tip of the first-ascent giant branch. Although the M-giant companion to the neutron star has a mass similar to the late-type star in low-mass X-ray binaries, its near-solar abundances and apparent runaway velocity are not fully consistent with the properties of this class of stars. Thus, in many ways this symbiotic X-ray binary system is unique, and various scenarios for its possible evolution are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据