4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1665-1671

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9115

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose We previously identified in a single-center study a 76-gene prognostic signature for lymph node-negative (LNN) breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to validate this gene signature in an independent more diverse population of LNN patients from multiple institutions. Patients and Methods Using custom-designed DNA chips we analyzed the expression of the 76 genes in RNA of frozen tumor samples from 180 LNN patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic treatment. Results In this independent validation, the 76-gene signature was highly informative in identifying patients with distant metastasis within 5 years (hazard ratio, [HR], 7.41; 95% Cl, 2.63 to 20.9), even when corrected for traditional prognostic factors in multivariate analysis (HR, 11.36; 95% Cl, 2.67 to 48.4). The actuarial 5- and 10-year distant metastasis-free survival were 96% (95% Cl, 89% to 99%) and 94% (95% Cl, 83% to 98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 74% (95% Cl, 64% to 81 %) and 65% (53% to 74%), respectively for the poor profile group. The sensitivity for 5-yr distant metastasis-free survival was 90%, and the specificity was 50%. The positive and negative predictive values were 38% (95% Cl, 29% to 47%) and 94% (95% Cl, 86% to 97%), respectively. The 76-gene signature was confirmed as a strong prognostic factor in subgroups of estrogen receptor-positive patients, pre- and postmenopausal patients, and patients with tumor sizes 20 mm or smaller. The subgroup of patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors was considered too small to perform a separate analysis. Conclusion Our data provide a strong methodologic and clinical multicenter validation of the predefined prognostic 76-gene signature in LNN breast cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据