4.4 Article

Genetic influences on dynamic complexity of brain oscillations

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 397, 期 1-2, 页码 93-98

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.025

关键词

electroencephalogram; complexity; nonlinear dynamics; twins; heritability

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [5P50 AA11998-03, P50 AA011998-03, P50 AA011998] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [K01 DA000421-02, K01 DA000421, DA00421-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human electroencephalogram (EEG) consists of complex aperiodic oscillations that are assumed to indicate underlying neural dynamics such as the number and degree of independence of oscillating neuronal networks. EEG complexity can be estimated using measures derived from nonlinear dynamic systems theory. Variations in such measures have been shown to be associated with normal individual differences in cognition and some neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite the increasing use of EEG complexity measures for the study of normal and abnormal brain functioning, little is known about genetic and environmental influences on these measures. Using the pointwise dimension (PD2) algorithm, this study assessed heritability of EEG complexity at rest in a sample of 214 young female twins consisting of 51 monozygotic (MZ) and 56 dizygotic (DZ) pairs. In MZ twins, intrapair correlations were high and statistically significant; in DZ twins, correlations were substantially smaller. Genetic analyses using linear structural equation modeling revealed high and significant heritability of EEG complexity: 62-68% in the eyes-closed condition, and 46-60% in the eyes-open condition. Results suggest that individual differences in the complexity of resting electrocortical dynamics are largely determined by genetic factors. Neurophysiological mechanisms mediating genetic variation in EEG complexity may include the degree of structural connectivity and functional differentiation among cortical neuronal assemblies. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据