4.3 Article

Clinical and immunological characteristics in 552 systemic lupus erythematosus patients in a southern province of China

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.12480

关键词

clinical characteristics; immunological characteristics; systemic lupus erythematosus

资金

  1. High Technology Research and Development Program of China (The 863 Program) [012AA02A513]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Hakka populations. Methods: We studied the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics in a cohort of 552 SLE patients diagnosed at the Rheumatology Department in MeiZhou People's Hospital from January 2008 to December 2012. There were 495 women and 57 men (8.7 : 1) with a mean age of 35.3 years (range 12-78 years). The mean age at disease onset and the mean disease duration were 31.8 +/- 14.4 years and 3.3 +/- 2.8 years, respectively. Results: The most common clinical manifestations were arthritis (61.6%), followed by malar rash (52.7%), photosensitivity (22.8%), mouth ulcers (17.0%) and discoid lupus (14.7%). The prevalence was 46.7% for nephritis ( by biopsy), 18.3% for pleuritis, 15.6% for pericarditis and 4.9% for neuropsychiatric manifestations. The most common hematological manifestations were anemia (63.8%), followed by leucopenia (29.0%) and thrombocytopenia (14.9%). Antinuclear antibodies were detected in 99.8% of patients, followed by anti-double- stranded DNA (81.3%), anti-SSA ( Sjogren's syndrome antigen A)/Ro (58.7%), anti-ribonucleoprotein (36.8%), anti-Sm (35.7%), and anti-SSB/La (15.0%). Anti-cardiolipin immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM were detected in18.3% and 14.1% of patients, respectively. Active disease and infections were the two major causes of death. Conclusion: The clinical and immunological characteristics of the SLE patients in our study place our population in the middle of the spectrum between other Asian and Caucasian populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据