4.7 Article

A unique requirement for the leukotriene B4 receptor BLT1 for neutrophil recruitment in infl ammatory arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 203, 期 4, 页码 829-835

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20052349

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL04087] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI 050892, R01 AI050892] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [K08 AR054094, T32 AR007258-28, T32 AR007258] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrophil recruitment into tissue plays an important role in host defense and disease pathogenesis, including the inflammatory arthritides. A multitude of diverse chemoattractants have been implicated in neutrophil recruitment, suggesting that they have overlapping functions in mediating this critical biological response. However, here we demonstrate a unique, non-redundant role for the leukotriene B-4 receptor BLT1 in mediating neutrophil recruitment into the joint in the K/BxN mouse model of inflammatory arthritis. We demonstrate that neutrophil expression of BLT1 was absolutely required for arthritis generation and chemokine production in this model, and that specific BLT1 inhibition reversed established disease. Adoptive transfer of wild-type (WT) neutrophils restored arthritis and chemokine production in BLT1(-/-) mice. Surprisingly, the primary effect of the transferred WT neutrophils into BLT1(-/-) mice was to promote the entry of endogenous BLT1(-/-) neutrophils into the joints of these mice. However, continued joint inflammation was dependent on the presence of WT neutrophils, indicating an ongoing specific requirement for BLT1-activated neutrophils in mediating BLT1(-/-) neutrophil recruitment by other chemoattractants. These experiments demonstrate that neutrophil BLT1 functions in a novel and essential non - cellautonomous manner to enable the recruitment of additional neutrophils not expressing this receptor, thereby amplifying the inflammatory response in autoantibody-induced arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据