4.4 Article

Presenilin-dependent γ-secretase on plasma membrane and endosomes is functionally distinct

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 15, 页码 4907-4914

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi052412w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presenilin (PS)/gamma-secretase complex, which contains not only PS but also Aph-1, PEN-2, and nicastrin, mediates proteolysis of the transmernbrane domain of beta-amyloid protein precursor (beta APP). Intramembrane proteolysis occurs at the interface between the membrane and cytosol (epsilon-site) and near the middle of the transmembrane domain (gamma-site), generating the beta APP intracellular domain (AICD) and Alzheimer disease-associated A beta, respectively. Both cleavage sites exhibit some diversity. Changes in the precision of gamma-cleavage, which potentially results in secretion of pathogenic A beta 42, have been intensively studied, while those of epsilon-cleavage have not. Although a number of PS-associated factors have been identified, it is unclear whether any of them physiologically regulate the precision of cleavage by PS/gamma-secretase. Moreover, there is currently no clear evidence of whether PS/gamma-secretase function differs according to the subcellular site. Here, we show that endocytosis affects the precision of PS-dependent epsilon-cleavage in cell Culture. Relative production of longer AICD epsilon 49 increases on the plasma membrane, whereas that of shorter AICD epsilon 51 increases on endosomes; however, this occurs without a concomitant major chancre in the precision of cleavage at gamma-sites. Moreover, very similar changes in the precision of epsilon-cleavage are induced by alteration of the pH. Our findings demonstrate that the precision of epsilon-cleavage by PS/gamma-secretase changes depending upon the conditions and the subcellular location. These results Suggest that the precision of cleavage by the PS/gamma-secretase complex may be physiologically regulated by the subcellular location and conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据