4.4 Article

Examination of the premelting transition of DNA A-tracts using a fluorescent adenosine analogue

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 15, 页码 5039-5047

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0518343

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM08271] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fluorescent adenosine analogue 4-amino-8-(2-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)-5'-O-dimethoxytrityl-6-methyl-7(8H)-pteridone (6MAP) has been used to perforin residue specific analyses of DNA A-tracts during the premelting transition. DNA A-tracts, which exhibit sequence-induced curvature, adopt a B-DNA conformation as a function of increasing temperature. Fluorescence melting curves indicate that 6MAP is a more sensitive reporter of the premelting transition than UV absorption spectroscopy. Further, residue specific fluorescence analyses of A-tract and control duplexes reveal that some of the conformational changes associated with the premelting transition occur within A-tract regions. Analyses of the energetics of the premelting transition indicate that ApA steps make a larger enthalpic contribution to the premelting transition than ApT steps. To explore the effect of cations on the premelting transition, fluorescence melts were performed in the presence of NH4+, Mg2+, and low (0.05 M) and high (0.5 M) concentrations of Na+. These studies show that the fluorescence intensity changes associated with the premelting transition are sensitive to cation type and concentration and are larger and more pronounced in the presence of 0.5 M Na+, NH4+, and Mg2+. incorporation of 6MAP into longer duplexes containing phased A-tracts shows that the local environment of adenosines in phased A-tracts is similar to that of individual A-tracts. Fluorescence quenching results indicate that ApA and ApT steps within A-tracts are less solvent exposed than their counterparts in control sequence isomers, possibly because of the narrowed minor groove of A-tract sequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据