4.4 Article

Increase in bFGF-responsive neural progenitor population following contusion injury of the adult rodent spinal cord

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 397, 期 3, 页码 174-179

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.051

关键词

spinal cord injury; neural progenitor cell; bFGF; radial glia; glial scar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of neural progenitor cells, especially nestin(+) cells or BrdU-uptake cells is sparse in the normal adult rodent spinal cord. However, in the present study, we show that after spinal cord injury (SCI), many ordinarily quiescent cells were activated to become nestin(+) and undergo mitosis (BrdU(+)) in the ependymal layer as well as in the parenchyma of the spinal cord. Nestin(+) cells and BrdU(+) cells were in most cases immunohistochemically GFAP(+), some of which displayed radial glial cell morphology and partly participated in the border formation of the lesion. The culturing of injured rat spinal cord tissues generated more neurospheres earlier than did the culturing of intact tissues, and these neurosphere cells were multipotent and bFGF-responsive. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that there existed many bFGF(+) cells after SCI, the number of which were almost 15 times greater than that in an intact spinal cord. Increased bFGF production after SCI might activate quiescent progenitor cells, and thus initiate their cell proliferation. Finally, SCI to the nestin-promoter green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice showed broad proliferation of progenitor cells that were induced in the injured spinal cord. The culturing of injured spinal cord tissues from these transgenic mice provides direct evidence that neurospheres can be generated by SCI-activated nestin(+) cells. Thus, the activation of bFGF-responsive progenitor cells and the concomitant increase in the population of bFGF(+) cells following SCI might be beneficial for spinal cord repair if these progenitor cells are properly manipulated. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据