4.5 Article

The live Mycobacterium tuberculosis phoP mutant strain is more attenuated than BCG and confers protective immunity against tuberculosis in mice and guinea pigs

期刊

VACCINE
卷 24, 期 17, 页码 3408-3419

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.017

关键词

tuberculosis; attenuation; live vaccine; BCG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis phoP mutant strain SO2 has previously been shown to have reduced multiplication in mouse macrophages and in vivo using the mouse intravenous-infection model. In this study we demonstrate that the M. tuberculosis SO2 is highly attenuated when compared with the parental M. tuberculosis MT103 strain and also more attenuated than BCG in severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID) mice. Complementation of the M. tuberculosis SO2 with the wild-type phoP gene restored the virulence of the strain in the SCID mice, confirming that the attenuated phenotype is due to the phoP mutation. In Balb/c mice subcutaneously vaccinated with either M. tuberculosis SO2 or BCG, the proportions of CD4(+) and CD8(+) populations measured in the spleen were significantly higher in the M. tuberculosis SO2 vaccinated group. In addition, the proportion of antigen-stimulated CD4(+)/CD8(+) cells expressing IFN-gamma was significantly higher in the M. tuberculosis SO2 vaccinated group when compared with the BCG group. Balb/c mice subcutaneously vaccinated with the M. tuberculosis SO2 strain were also protected against intra-venous challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv at levels comparable to mice vaccinated with BCG, as measured by reduced bacterial counts in lung and spleens. Guinea pigs subcutaneously vaccinated with the M. tuberculosis SO2 strain were protected against aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis H37Rv delivered at different doses. A high dose aerosol challenge of M. tuberculosis SO2 vaccinated guinea pigs resulted in superior levels of protection when compared with BCG vaccination, as measured by guinea pig survival and reduction in disease severity in the lung. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据