4.7 Article

Characterization of a soluble ligand binding domain of the NMDA receptor regulatory subunit NR3A

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 4559-4566

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0560-06.2006

关键词

glutamate receptor; NMDA; gating; antagonist; agonist; proteolysis

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NR3A is expressed widely in the developing CNS of mammals. Coassembly of NR3A with NR1 and NR2 modifies NMDA receptormediated responses, reducing calcium permeability and single- channel conductance. The ligand binding properties of NR3A are unknown but shape the role NR3A plays when incorporated into NMDA receptors. Here, a soluble NR3A ligand binding domain ( NR3A S1S2) was constructed based on amino acid sequence alignments with other glutamate receptor ion channels and is expressed in Escherichia coli. After purification by affinity, gel filtration, and ion exchange chromatography, NR3A S1S2 behaves as a monomer even at a concentration of 20 mg/ml, as determined by size-exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering. NR3A S1S2 has very high affinity for glycine with an apparent dissociation constant (K-d) of 40nM, 650- fold less than the Kd for NR1. Glutamate, which binds to NR2 subunits, also binds to NR3A, but with very low affinity (K-d = 9.6mM); in contrast, binding of glutamate to NR1 was not detectable even at a 300 mM concentration. The antagonist binding profiles of NR3A and NR1 also show striking differences. 6-Cyano-2,3-dihydroxy-7nitro- quinoxaline ( CNQX), and its analog CGP78608, bind to NR3A S1S2 with low micromolar affinity, whereas for NR1, the affinity of CGP78608 increases 1000-fold compared with CNQX. Other high-affinity NR1 antagonists also show very weak binding to NR3A. Proteolysis protection experiments reveal that CNQX and CGP78608 bind to and stabilize domain 1 of NR3A S1S2 but increase proteolysis of domain 2, indicating that they produce conformational changes distinct from those induced by glycine and D-serine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据