4.7 Article

Preconditioning doses of NMDA promote neuroprotection by enhancing neuronal excitability

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 4509-4518

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0455-06.2006

关键词

apoptosis; calcium [ Ca]; transcription; excitability; kinase; CREB; signal transduction; tolerance; NMDA receptor; neuroprotection; PI3 kinase

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [078178] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroprotection can be induced by low doses of NMDA, which activate both synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. This is in apparent contradiction with our recent findings that extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signaling exerts a dominant inhibitory effect on prosurvival signaling from synaptic NMDA receptors. Here we report that exposure to low preconditioning doses of NMDA results in preferential activation of synaptic NMDA receptors because of a dramatic increase in action potential firing. Both acute and long-lasting phases of neuroprotection in the face of apoptotic or excitotoxic insults are dependent on this firing enhancement. Key mediators of synaptic NMDA receptor-dependent neuroprotection, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-Akt (PI3 kinase-Akt) signaling to Forkhead box subgroup 0 ( FOXO) export and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3 beta) inhibition and cAMP response element-binding protein-dependent (CREB-dependent) activation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF), can be induced only by low doses of NMDA via this action potential-dependent route. In contrast, NMDA doses on the other side of the toxicity threshold do not favor synaptic NMDA receptor activation because they strongly suppress firing rates below baseline. The classic bell- shaped curve depicting neuronal fate in response to NMDA dose can be viewed as the net effect of two antagonizing ( synaptic vs extrasynaptic) curves: via increased firing the synaptic signaling dominates at low doses, whereas firing becomes suppressed and extrasynaptic signaling dominates as the toxicity threshold is crossed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据