4.6 Article

Internalization and recycling of the human prostacyclin receptor is modulated through its isoprenylation-dependent interaction with the δ subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 17, 页码 11780-11786

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M513110200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL066233] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostacyclin, the major cyclooxygenase-derived product of arachidonic acid formed in the vasculature, mediates its potent anti-thrombotic and anti-proliferative effects through its G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) termed the IP. Unlike many GPCRs, agonist-induced internalization of the IP occurs in an arrestin/ GPCR kinase-independent manner. However, deletion of the IP COOH-terminal region prevented internalization suggesting that protein interactions at this region are involved in IP regulation. Using the COOH-terminal region of IP as bait we identified the delta subunit of cGMP phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6 delta) as a novel hIP-interacting protein in two independent yeast two-hybrid screens. Interaction of IP and PDE6 delta was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation in HEK293 cells, and in HEPG2 cells, which endogenously express neither IP nor PDE6 delta. IP isoprenylation was critical for this interaction, as PDE6 delta was unable to associate with an isoprenylation-deficient mutant IP (IPSSLC). PDE6 delta overexpression altered the temporal pattern of agonist-induced internalization of IP, but not IPSSLC, in HEPG2 cells, increasing initial internalization but facilitating the return of IP to the cell surface despite the continued presence of agonist. Depletion of PDE6 delta using short interfering RNA abolished cicaprost-induced IP internalization in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Recycling of IP, but not IPSSLC, upon agonist removal was facilitated by overexpression of PDE6 delta. Thus PDE6 delta interacts specifically with IP to modulate receptor trafficking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据