4.7 Article

Magnetic study of an Antarctic weathering profile on basalt: Implications for recent weathering on Mars

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 244, 期 3-4, 页码 501-514

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.02.033

关键词

Antarctica; Ferrar dolerite; Mars; regolith; rock magnetism; weathering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to better interpret the Martian surface weathering-related mineralogy, we focused on a relevant analogue of the Martian subsurface in terms of lithology and paleoclimate: the Jurassic-aged Ferrar dolerite (Priestley Glacier, Transantarctic Mountains), weathered in cold and dry climate. Together with chemical and mineralogical studies, rock magnetic properties were investigated and completed with Mossbauer measurements. Weathering of the decimetric block is evidenced by chemical profiles showing ail increase in Fe content (from 10.5 in the core to 13wt.% in the surface) and a decrease in Si (from 57 to 53 wt.%, respectively). According to mineralogical, thermomagnetic and hysteresis properties, the main opaque mineral is inherited titanomaghemite, with a concentration about 1%. Enhancement in low field magnetic susceptibility (from 4.10(-6) to 10-10(-6)m(3)/kg, respectively) and saturation magnetization (from 0.44 to 0.96Am(2)/kg, respectively) indicates the neoformation of metastable maghemite. Neoformed red ferric (oxy)hydroxides are abundant in the surface. High field susceptibility normalized to iron concentration and Mossbauer spectra indicate a replacement of Fe2+ from primary silicates (pyroxene) by poorly crystalline anti ferromagnetic Fe3+ (oxy) hydroxides. Thus, highly magnetic titanomaghemite and maghemite coexist with nanosized ferric (oxy)hydroxides and primary silicates, in accordance with Martian in situ observations. Therefore, this study supports the formation of the Martian regolith as resulting from a slow weathering process in near present day conditions. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据