4.7 Article

Antibiofilm activity of GlmU enzyme inhibitors against catheter-associated uropathogens

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 1835-1840

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1835-1840.2006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The colonization of uropathogenic bacteria on urinary catheters resulting in biofilm formation frequently leads to the infection of surrounding tissue and often requires removal of the catheter. Infections associated with biofilms are difficult to treat since they may be more than 1,000 times more resistant to antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts. We have developed an antibiolilm composition comprising an N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase (GImU) inhibitor and protamine sulfate, a cationic polypeptide. The antibiofilm activity of GImU inhibitors, such as iodoacetamide (IDA), N-ethyl maleimide (NEM), and NEM analogs, including N-phenyl maieimide, N,N '-(1,2-phenylene)dimaleimide (oPDM), and N-J-pyrenyl) maleimide (PyrMl), was tested against that of catheter-associated uropathogens. Both IDA and NEM inhibited biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. All NEM analogs showed antibiotilm activity against clinical isolates of E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecalis. The combination of oPDM with protamine sulfate (PS) enhanced its antibiofilm activity and reduced its effective concentration to as low as 12.5 mu M. In addition, we found that the in vitro inhibitory activity of oPDM-plusPS-coated silicone catheters against A aeruginosa and S. epidermidis colonization was superior to that of catheters coated with silver hydrogel. Confocal scanning laser microscopy further confirmed that the oPDM-plus-PS-coated silicone catheters were almost free from bacterial colonization. Thus, a broad-spectrum antibiofilm composition comprising a GImU inhibitor and protamine sulfate shows promise for use in anti-infective coatings for medical devices, including urinary catheters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据