4.5 Article

Three-dimensional analysis of water infiltration into the Gouhou rockfill dam using saturated-unsaturated seepage theory

期刊

CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 449-461

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/T06-011

关键词

seepage; seepage failure; rockfill dam; unsaturated soils; wetting front; numerical analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gouhou Dam was a concrete-faced rockfill dam built in a steep canyon that collapsed in 1993 due to internal erosion during the initial reservoir filling. In this paper, the process of water infiltration into the originally unsaturated rockfill dam is studied using three-dimensional saturated-unsaturated seepage theory. The three-dimensional characteristics of seepage through the dam bounded by steep abutments, the effect of material anisotropy, and the effect of rockfill stratifications are studied. The three-dimensional results are compared with those from two-dimensional analyses. The three-dimensional simulations show that seepage water flows faster and the hydraulic gradients are greater near the abutment boundary in the dam. As such, the evolution of the seepage failure in the three-dimensional cases is faster than that in the two-dimensional analyses, and the two-dimensional analyses will underestimate the risk of seepage failure, particularly near the abutment boundary. If the materials in the dam were uniform, the reservoir water would infiltrate into the dam along a downward flow path towards the riverbed, and not exit from the surface on the downstream slope. Increasing the horizontal coefficient of permeability of the rockfill increases the infiltration velocity, but the material anisotropy does not appreciably change the infiltration pattern. Stratifications in the rockfill, however, cause the seepage water to advance more quickly in the horizontal direction along the interface between the sandwich layer and the rockfill, thus increasing the possibility of seepage failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据