4.7 Article

Liver tumor model with implanted rhabdomyosarcoma in rats: MR imaging, microangiography, and histopathologic analysis

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 239, 期 2, 页码 554-562

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050277

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In compliance with institutional regulations for care and use of laboratory animals, the aim of this study was to establish and characterize a rodent liver tumor model to provide a platform for preclinical assessment of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. A rhabdomyosarcoma tumor was implanted in the right and left liver lobes of 20 rats, for a total of 40 tumors. T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images, diffusion-weighted images, and dynamic susceptibility contrast agent-enhanced perfusion-weighted images were obtained up to 16 days after tumor implantation and were compared with postmortem three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) images, digital microangiograms, and histopathologic findings. Fifteen tumors were examined with proton (H-1) MR spectroscopy. All tumors grew, with a mean volume doubling time of 2.2 days +/- 0.9 ( standard deviation) and a final size of 591 mm(3) +/- 124. The rhabdomyosarcoma tumor showed hypervascularity at MR imaging, three-dimensional CT, microangiography, and histologic analysis. On dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion- weighted images, the maximum signal intensity decrease differed in time and extent between the tumor and the liver, with a significantly (P <.001) higher relative blood volume, relative blood flow, and permeability value in the tumor than in the liver. With H-1 MR spectroscopy, the rhabdomyosarcoma tumor and the liver featured significant (P <.001) choline and lipid peaks, respectively. Implantation of a rhabdomyosarcoma tumor in the livers of rats is feasible and reproducible, and this animal model seems promising for future testing of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. (c) RSNA, 2006.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据