4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

European clinical evaluation: Use of Intacs for the treatment of keratoconus

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 747-755

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.064

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Intacs inserts in keratoconic eyes to alter corneal shape and refractive power and stabilize the progression of corneal ectasia. SETTING: Service d'Ophtalmologie, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: In this prospective study, 57 eyes with clear central corneas that were diagnosed with keratoconus and contact lens intolerant were followed for up to 1 year. The primary objectives were to assess the safety of Intacs and the visual outcomes by measuring uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, keratometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), pachymetry, and patient satisfaction. The stability of the refraction, keratometry, and visual acuity measurements was also assessed. RESULTS: At the 6-month examination, 78% of patients showed improvement of 2 lines or more in UCVA (P<.001). Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better improved from 53% of patients preoperatively to 74% of patients (P <=.033). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved to 3.1 +/- 2.5 diopters (D) (P<.001) compared with the preoperative examination. Keratometry decreased a mean of -4.3 +/- 2.8 D from the preoperative readings (P <=.002). These changes appeared to be stable overtime. At 6 months, there were no adverse events, no clinically significant increase in IOP, and no decrease in central corneal thickness. In 7 of 57 eyes (12%), the Intacs were removed due to dissatisfaction with visual symptoms. There were no adverse effects or complications associated with the Intacs removal. CONCLUSIONS: Intacs were safe and effective for treating keratoconus. All patients demonstrated improved objective visual outcomes; functional vision was restored in most patients. Intacs were removed without permanent sequelae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据