4.6 Article

Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 117, 期 5, 页码 1063-1074

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.005

关键词

attention; spatial; response preparation; event-related brain potentials; visual processing; auditory processing

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [072524] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated whether covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts, as postulated by the premotor theory of attention, and whether these result in spatially specific modulations of visual and auditory processing. Methods: Visual response cues instructed participants to prepare to lift their left or right index finger in response to a subsequent target stimulus. Irrelevant visual or auditory probes were delivered to the left or right hand during the response preparation interval. ERPs were measured time-locked to cue onset, and time-locked to probe stimulus onset. Results: Lateralised ERP components triggered during covert response preparation (ADAN, LDAP) were similar to components previously found during attention shifts. NI components were enhanced to visual probes delivered adjacent to the cued response relative to those delivered to the opposite hand. Auditory probe ERPs were unaffected by manual response preparation. Conclusions: Shifts of spatial attention that are triggered during covert unimanual response preparation result in spatially specific modulations of visual but not auditory processing. Significance: Results support the claim of the premotor theory that the preparation of manual responses is associated with attention shifts. However, such shifts are Dot based on purely supramodal processes, as they result in a modality-specific pattern of sensory modulations. (c) 2006 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据