4.5 Article

Modulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis proliferation by MtrA, an essential two-component response regulator

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 643-657

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05137.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI64502, AI49534, R01 AI048417, R01 AI048417-05, AI48417, AI41406] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paired two-component regulatory systems consisting of a sensor kinase and a response regulator are the major means by which bacteria sense and respond to different stimuli. The role of essential response regulator, MtrA, in Mycobacterium tuberculosis proliferation is unknown. We showed that elevating the intracellular levels of MtrA prevented M. tuberculosis from multiplying in macrophages, mice lungs and spleens, but did not affect its growth in broth. Intracellular trafficking analysis revealed that a vast majority of MtrA overproducing merodiploids were associated with lysosomal associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) positive vacuoles, indicating that intracellular growth attenuation is, in part, due to an impaired ability to block phagosome-lysosome fusion. A merodiploid strain producing elevated levels of phosphorylation-defective MtrA (MtrA(D53N)) was partially replicative in macrophages, but was attenuated in mice. Quantitative real-time PCR analyses revealed that expression of dnaA, an essential replication gene, was sharply upregulated during intramacrophage growth in the MtrA overproducer in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Chromatin immunoprecipitation using anti-MtrA antibodies provided direct evidence that MtrA regulator binds to dnaA promoter in vivo indicating that dnaA promoter is a MtrA target. Simultaneous overexpression of mtrA regulator and its cognate mtrB kinase neither inhibited growth nor sharply increased the expression levels of dnaA in macrophages. We propose that proliferation of M. tuberculosis in vivo depends, in part, on the optimal ratio of phosphorylated to non-phosphorylated MtrA response regulator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据