4.6 Article

Effects of macrolides on pneumolysin of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1020-1025

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00116805

关键词

azithromycin; clarithromycin; macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae; pneumolysin; sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To clarity the discrepancy between increasing resistance and conservative clinical effects of macrolides on macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, the authors evaluated the effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of macrolides on pneumolysin. In vitro, S. pneumoniae was incubated with 1, 2 and 4 mu g.mL(-1) of clarithromycin (CLR) and azithromycin (AZM) for 8 h. Western blot analysis and haemolytic assay were performed to examine the production and activities of pneumolysin. In vivo, mice were infected with S. pneumoniae intra-nasally and treated with CLR (40 or 200 mg(.)kg(-1) twice daily) or AZM (40 or 200 mg(.)kg(-1) once daily) orally for 7 days. After 72 h post-infection, western blot analysis was performed to examine pneumolysin production in lungs. Survival rates were observed for 10 days. In vitro, every concentration of macrolide inhibited pneumolysin production more than the control. CLR (2 and 4 mu g-ml(-1) and AZM (4 mu g.mL(-1)) reduced the pneumolysin activities more than the control. In vivo, macrolides (200 mg.kg-1) reduced pneumolysin in murine lungs more than the control. CLR (40 and 200 mg(.)kg(-1) and AZM (200 mg.kg(-1)) improved the survival rates more than the control. The study results show that sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of macrolides reduced pneumolysin. This might be related to the effectiveness of macrolides against pneumonia caused by high-level macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the effects of macrolides on macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据