4.5 Article

Determination of the two-dimensional interaction rate constants of a cytokine receptor complex

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 90, 期 9, 页码 3345-3355

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.072546

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ligand-receptor interactions within the plane of the plasma membrane play a pivotal role for transmembrane signaling. The biophysical principles of protein-protein interactions on lipid bilayers, though, have hardly been experimentally addressed. We have dissected the interactions involved in ternary complex formation by ligand-induced cross-linking of the subunits of the type I interferon (IFN) receptors ifnar1 and ifnar2 in vitro. The extracellular domains ifnar1-ectodomain (EC) and ifnar2-EC were tethered in an oriented manner on solid-supported lipid bilayers. The interactions of IFN alpha 2 and several mutants, which exhibit different association and dissociation rate constants toward ifnar1-EC and ifnar2-EC, were monitored by simultaneous label-free detection and surface-sensitive fluorescence spectroscopy. Surface dissociation rate constants were determined by measuring ligand exchange kinetics, and by measuring receptor exchange on the surface by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Strikingly, approximately three-times lower dissociation rate constants were observed for both receptor subunits compared to the dissociation in solution. Based on these directly determined surface-dissociation rate constants, the surface-association rate constants were assessed by probing ligand dissociation at different relative surface concentrations of the receptor subunits. In contrast to the interaction in solution, the association rate constants depended on the orientation of the receptor components. Furthermore, the large differences in association kinetics observed in solution were not detectable on the surface. Based on these results, the key roles of orientation and lateral diffusion on the kinetics of protein interactions in plane of the membrane are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据