4.6 Article

Metabolic phenotype of isoflavones differ among female rats, pigs, monkeys, and women

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 136, 期 5, 页码 1215-1221

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/136.5.1215

关键词

isoflavone; daidzein; genistein; equol; interspecies difference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various physiologic effects of soy food consumption have been attributed to the estrogenic actions of isoflavones. The order of estrogen receptor binding potency of soy-derived isoflavone aglycones is equol > genistein > daidzein, and their conjugates are less potent. Because the metabolic profile may be an important determinant of bioactivity after soy intake, we studied the serum and urine isoflavone concentrations in 3 animal models and compared them with isoflavone profiles in women. Female Sprague-Dawley rats, Hampshire/Duroc Cross pigs, cynomolgus monkeys, and women were fed diets containing soy protein isolate. lsoflavones and their metabolites were measured by LC-MS or electrochemical detection. Equol represented similar to 77 and 52% (molar ratio) of summed serum isoflavones (isoflavones plus metabolites) in rats and cynomolgus monkeys, respectively. Equol was undetectable in pig serum and human plasma, but daidzein and genistein contributed > 88% of summed circulating isoflavones. Monkey and rat urine contained high levels of aglycones (> 85% and > 32%, respectively), whereas pigs and women excreted isoflavone mainly in the form of glucuronides (> 80%), with > 10% as aglycones. lsoflavones in human plasma were predominantly glucuronicles (75%) with 24% as sulfates and < 1% as aglycones; in monkey serum, however, 64% of isoflavones were sulfates, 30% glucuronicles, and 6% aglycones. Equol was also a major serum metabolite of 6-mo-old rhesus monkeys (80% of summed isoflavones). Thus, there were significant interspecies differences in isoflavone metabolism, and the overall metabolic profile of pigs was closer to that of women than that of rats or monkeys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据