4.7 Article

Expression of novel molecules, MICAL2-PV (MICAL2 prostate cancer variants), increases with high Gleason score and prostate cancer progression

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 2767-2773

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1995

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify novel molecular targets for development of novel treatment or diagnostic markers of prostate cancer through genome-wide cDNA microarray analysis of prostate cancer cells purified by laser microdissection. Experimental Design and Results: Here, we identified molecule interacting with CasL-2 prostate cancer variants (MICAL2-PV), novel splicing variants of MICAL2, showing overexpression in prostate cancer cells. Immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody generated specific to MICAL2-PV revealed that MICAL2-PV was expressed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells with various staining patterns and intensities, whereas it was not or hardly detectable in adjacent normal prostate epithelium or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Interestingly, immunohistochemical analysis of 105 prostate cancer specimens on the tissue microarray indicated that MICAL2-PV expression status was strongly correlated with Gleason scores (P < 0.0001) or tumor classification (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the expression levels of MICAL2-PVs were also concordant to those of c-Met, a marker of tumor progression, with statistical significance (P = 0.0018). To investigate its potential of molecular therapeutic target for prostate cancers, we knocked down endogenous MICAL2-PVs in prostate cancer cells by small interfering RNA, which resulted in the significant reduction of prostate cancer cell viability. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that MICAL2-PV is likely to be involved in cancer progression of prostate cancer and could be a candidate as a novel molecular marker and/or target for treatment of prostate cancers with high Gleason score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据