4.7 Article

Extractability and bioavailability of zinc over time in three tropical soils incubated with biosolids

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 63, 期 5, 页码 762-771

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.014

关键词

bioavailability; biosolids; Brassica chinensis L.; land application; sequential extraction; zinc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytotoxicity of heavy metal is the primary concern in applying biosolids (sewage sludge) to agricultural land. This study evaluates the changes in chemical speciation of Zn in three tropical soils of Taiwan measured with sequential extraction over a one-year period. Biosolids were applied to the soils at application rates of 10, 50 and 100 Mg ha(-1), and correlated diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and sequential extraction as extract for prediction of Zn bioavailability to Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis L.). Experimental results indicated that the exchangeable (F1) and Fe-Mn oxide (F3) fractions in the sequential extractions increased with application rate of biosolids in the soils over time. Large amounts of Zn in the soils following the cessation of biosolids application were identified as soluble and were adsorbed by Fe-Mn oxides. The organically bound Zn, which is associated with readily decomposable carbon, is in limited amounts in the biosolid-treated soils. The DTPA-extractable concentrations of Zn in all biosolid-treated soils decreased over the time. A positive and significant correlation (r(2) = 0.96) was found between the Zn concentrations extracted with DTPA and sum of F1 and carbonate-bound (F2) fractions in the sequential extractions. Additionally, the concentrations of Zn extracted with DTPA were strongly correlated with the concentrations of Zn in the shoots of Chinese cabbages, indicating that F1 + F2 in the sequential extractions was reliable for predicting Zn bioavailability to Chinese cabbage in the biosolid-treated soils. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据