4.7 Article

Elevated circulating levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in type 1 diabetic patients with and without retinopathy

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 367, 期 1-2, 页码 103-107

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.11.029

关键词

metalloproteinase; extracellular matrix; diabetes mellitus; retinopathy; blood measurement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Tissue expression pattern of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors TIMPs indicate that microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus are associated with extracellular matrix remodelling. We investigated whether circulating levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 are altered in diabetic retinopathy and whether they might serve as biological markers of ocular complications in type 1 diabetes. Research design and methods: We recruited 47 type 1 diabetic patients free of vascular complications (n = 40) or with retinopathy (n = 14). Patients with macroangiopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy were excluded. A group of nondiabetic control subjects (n=35) was also constituted for comparative purposes. Peripheral blood levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were determined using immunoenzymatic assays. Results: Type 1 diabetic subjects exhibited significantly higher circulating levels of both MMP-9 and MMP-9/TlMP-1 ratio, as well as a tendency to increased serum TIMP-1 levels relative to nondiabetic controls (p < 0.001). Diabetic patients with retinopathy also displayed elevated systemic values of MMP-9 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio when compared to patients without retinopathy (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified diabetes duration firstly (P < 0.01), and MMP-9 serum levels secondly (P < 0.01) as significant and independent variables associated with the existence of retinopathy. Conclusions: Our data Suggest that peripheral blood MMP-9 levels might serve as surrogate biomarkers of retinopathy in type I diabetic patients free of other vascular complications. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据