4.2 Article

Should excised keloid scars be sent for routine histologic analysis?

期刊

ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 186-187

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318056d6cc

关键词

keloid

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Keloid scarring is a clinical diagnosis, usually preceded by a history of localized trauma. Significant variation exists as to whether excised specimens are sent for routine histologic analysis. We aimed to review the histology of all clinically diagnosed keloids at our unit. Methods: All keloids diagnosed clinically and excised were identified between April 1995 and April 2006. The subsequent histology results were analyzed. Results: Five hundred sixty-eight specimens were sent for pathologic investigation over an 11-year period. Four hundred fifty-eight (81%) were reported as keloid, 60 (11%) as acne keloidatis, 3 5 (6%) as hypertropbic scar, and 14 (2%) as normal scar. There were no reported malignancies or dysplasias. Discussion: These histology results suggest that, given a good clinical suspicion of keloid, it may be unnecessary to send specimens at excision for routine histology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据