4.8 Article

Senescence-associated phenotypes in Akita diabetic mice are enhanced by absence of bradykinin B2 receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 116, 期 5, 页码 1302-1309

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI26958

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL049277, R01 HL071266, U01 HL070523, HL49277, R01 HL049277-15, HL70523, HL71266, R01 HL049277-14] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously reported that genetically increased angiotensin-converting enzyme levels, or absence of the bradykinin B2 receptor, increase kidney damage in diabetic mice. We demonstrate here that this is part of a more general phenomenon - diabetes and, to a lesser degree, absence of the B2 receptor, independently but also largely additively when combined, enhance senescence-associated phenotypes in multiple tissues. Thus, at 12 months of age, indicators of senescence (alopecia, skin atrophy, kyphosis, osteoporosis, testicular atrophy, lipofuscin accumulation in renal proximal tubule and testicular Leydig cells, and apoptosis in the testis and intestine) are virtually absent in WT mice, detectable in B2 receptor-null mice, clearly apparent in mice diabetic because of a dominant mutation (Akita) in the Ins2 gene, and most obvious in Akita diabetic plus B2 receptor-null mice. Renal expression of several genes that encode proteins associated with senescence and/or apoptosis (TGF-beta 1, connective tissue growth factor, p53, alpha-synuclein, and forkhead box 01) increases in the same progression. Concomitant increases occur in 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, point mutations and deletions in kidney mitochondrial DNA, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in plasma, together with decreases in the reduced form of glutathione in erythrocytes. Thus, absence of the bradykinin B2 receptor increases the oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA damage, and many senescence-associated phenotypes already present in untreated Akita diabetic mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据