4.6 Article

VEGF scaffolds enhance angiogenesis and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 735-744

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.060120

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01-DE013835, F30 DE05747] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Radiation therapy causes damage to tissues and inhibits its regenerative capacity. Tissue injury from radiation is in large part caused by a compromised vascular supply and reduced perfusion of tissues. The aim of. this study was to determine if delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from a biodegradable PLGA (copolymer Of D,L-lactide and glycolide) scaffold could enhance neovascularization and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects. Materials and Methods: An isolated area of the calvarium of Fisher rats was irradiated (12 Gy) 2 weeks preoperatively, and two 3.5-mm osseous defects were created in this area, followed by the placement of PLGA scaffolds or VEGF scaffolds (PLGA scaffolds with incorporated VEGF) into the defects. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was performed to measure perfusion of these areas at 1, 2, and 6 weeks. Implants were retrieved at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and histologic and mu CT analyses were performed to determine neovascularization and bone regeneration. Results: Histological analyses revealed statistically significant increases in blood vessel formation (> 2-fold) and function (30%) within the VEGF scaffolds compared with PLGA scaffolds. Additionally, evaluation of bone regeneration through bone histomorphometric and mu CT analyses revealed significantly greater bone coverage (26.36 +/- 6.91% versus 7.05 +/- 2.09% [SD]) and increased BMD (130.80 +/- 58.05 versus 71.28 +/- 42.94 mg/cm(3)) in VEGF scaffolds compared with PLGA scaffolds. Conclusions: Our findings show that VEGF scaffolds have the ability to enhance neovascularization and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects, outlining a novel approach for engineering tissues in hypovascular environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据