4.7 Article

Dynamic regulation and involvement of the heat shock transcriptional response in arsenic carcinogenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 207, 期 2, 页码 562-569

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20599

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30ES05022-17] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to better define induction of the heat shock response by arsenite, and to evaluation if induction of heat shock proteins (HSPs) contributes to the carcinogenic activity of arsenite. We show here that arsenite is a ubiquitous inducer of the heat shock response in mammalian cells: that it activated heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) DNA-binding activity, enhanced hsp 70 promoter, and induced hsp70mRNA and synthesis of HSP chaperones. Using a high throughput hsp70 promoter-luciferase reporter assay, we observed a hormetic dose response where low concentrations of arsenite stimulated and high concentrations inhibited. Further, the response was time-dependent such that with longer times of incubation, the dose response shifted to the left. The effect of arsenite in inducing the hsp 70-luciferase reporter absolutely required a functional HSF1 as it was not observed in HSF1 minus cells but re-instated by expression of HSF1. Consistent with the suggestion that arsenic targets vicinal cysteine-SH, we showed that dithiothreitol blocked the effect of arsenite. Assays of cell viability and caspase showed that arsenite caused a dose-dependent increase in cell death by activation of caspase 3/7 and pre-induction of HSPs blunted these effects. Using anchorage independent cell growth as a late stage tumor promotion assay, we showed that low concentrations of arsenite had a growth promoting effect, which was enhanced by moderate heat shock. Our study provides evidence that induction of the heat shock response is a sensitive biomarker of arsenic exposure and that induction of HSPs likely contributes to the tumor promotion effect of arsenic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据