4.5 Article

Diagnostic and prognostic value of cell-cycle regulatory genes in malignant thyroid neoplasms

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 767-774

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0308-2

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Approximately 30% of patients with thyroid nodules have indeterminate or suspicious fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy results. Because their risk of cancer is approximately 20%, these patients undergo thyroidectomy. We hypothesized that genes that regulate cell-cycle progression would be differentially expressed in malignant versus benign thyroid nodules and could serve as diagnostic markers and markers of disease aggressiveness. Methods: We used a cDNA array with 96 cell-cycle regulatory genes to identify differentially expressed genes in pooled benign versus malignant thyroid neoplasms. Genes up- or down-regulated by more than 2-fold in malignant thyroid neoplasms were further evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 95 patients with hyperplastic nodules (n = 19), follicular adenoma (n = 19), follicular thyroid cancer (n = 19), the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (n = 19), and papillary thyroid cancer (n = 19). Results: cDNA array analysis showed that cyclin B1, MCM5, MCM7, RAD9, ubiquitin C, CDK6, SKP2, and APAF1 were up-regulated in malignant thyroid neoplasms. Real-time quantitative PCR showed that MCM5, MCM7, and RAD9 mRNA expression were significantly higher in malignant than in benign thyroid neoplasms (<= 0.0012). The combined use of MCM5, MCM7, and RAD9 mRNA expression had a sensitivity of 98.2% and a specificity of 65.7%. The level of MCM7 mRNA expression was higher in T4 than in T1, T2, and T3 differentiated thyroid cancers (P < 0.0127). Conclusions: MCM5, MCM7, and RAD9 are overexpressed in malignant thyroid neoplasms of follicular cell origin. These genes may be useful markers of malignant thyroid neoplasms as an adjunct to FNA biopsy. MCM7 mRNA expression is higher in locally invasive differentiated thyroid cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据