4.4 Article

β2 and β4 subunits of BK channels confer differential sensitivity to acute modulation by steroid hormones

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 2878-2888

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01352.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-07469] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-15793] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS-40790] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane-associated receptors for rapid, steroidal neuromodulation remain elusive. Estradiol has been reported to facilitate activation of voltage- and Ca2+-dependent BK potassium channels encoded by Slo, if associated with beta 1 subunits. We show here that 1) multiple members of the beta family confer sensitivity to multiple steroids on BK channels, 2) that beta subunits differentiate between steroids, and 3) that different beta s have distinct relative preferences for particular steroids. Expressed in HEK 293 cells, inside-out patches with channels composed of Slo-alpha alone showed no steroid sensitivity. Cells expressing alpha beta 4 exhibited potent, rapid, reversible, and dose-dependent potentiation by corticosterone (CORT; a glucocorticoid), and were potentiated to a lesser degree by other sex and stress steroids. In contrast, alpha beta 2 channels were potentiated more strongly by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA; an enigmatic, stress-related adrenal androgen), and to a lesser extent by CORT, estradiol, testosterone, and DHEA-S. Cholesterol had no effect on any BK channel compositions tested. Conductance-voltage plots of channels composed of alpha plus beta 2 or beta 4 subunits were shifted in the negative direction by steroids, indicating greater activation at negative voltages. Thus our results argue that the variety of Slo-beta subunit coexpression patterns occurring in vivo expands the repertoire of Slo channel gating in yet another dimension not fully appreciated, rendering BK gating responsive to dynamic fluctuations in a multiple of steroid hormones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据