4.7 Article

Biodegradability of bio-flour filled biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) bio-composites in natural and compost soil

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 1117-1127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.002

关键词

bio-flour; poly(butylene succinate); biodegradability; microbial counts; bio-composites; green-composites; eco-materials; compost soil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the biodegradability of PBS and bio-flour, which is a poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) bio-composite filled with rice-husk flour (RHF) reinforcing, in natural and aerobic compost soil. The percentage weight loss and the reduction in mechanical properties of PBS and the bio-composites in the compost soil burial test were significantly greater than those in the natural soil burial test. These results were supported by degraded surface of PBS and bio-composites observed through morphological study and the total colony count of natural soil was lower than that of compost soil. The biodegradability of the bio-composites was enhanced with increasing bio-flour content because the bio-flour is easily attacked by microorganisms. As the biodegradability test progressed over time up to 80 days, the molecular weight of PBS decreased in the soil burial test. We confirmed by attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) analyser that the chemical structures of PBS and the bio-composites were changed after the compost burial test. The glass transition temperature (T-g), melting temperature (T-m), crystallization temperature (T-c), heat of fusion (Delta H-f) and heat of crystallization (Delta H-c) of the natural and composted soil tested PBS were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). From the results, we concluded that use of these bio-composites will reduce the environmental problems associated with waste pollution and the study findings support the predicted application of bio-composites as green-composites or eco-materials. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据