4.4 Article

Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: An fMRI investigation

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 144-164

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.02.017

关键词

violence; fMRI; brain dysfunction; schizophrenia; parietal lobe; frontal lobe

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [067427/Z/02/Z] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contemporary theories and evidence implicate frontal lobe dysfunction in violent behaviour as well as in schizophrenia. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate and compare brain activation during an 'n-back' working memory task in groups of men with (i) schizophrenia and a history of serious physical violence (VS; n = 13), (ii) schizophrenia without a history of violence (NVS: n = 12), (iii) antisocial personality disorder (APD) and a history of serious physical violence (n = 10), and (iv) no history of violence or a mental disorder (n = 13). We observed comparable performance in all four groups during the control (0-back) condition. Subtle working memory deficits were seen in the NVS and APD groups but severe deficits emerged in the VS group relative to the healthy group. The VS group showed activation deficit bilaterally in the frontal lobe and precuneus when compared to the healthy group, and in the right inferior parietal region when compared to the NVS group during the working memory load condition. Frontal (bilateral) as well as right inferior parietal activity was negatively associated with the ratings of violence across all schizophrenia patients, with the right parietal region showing this association most strongly. APD patients, relative to healthy subjects, showed activation deficit in the left frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate and precuneus. It is concluded that reduced functional response in the frontal and inferior parietal regions leads to serious violence in schizophrenia perhaps via impaired executive functioning. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据