4.4 Article

The energy cost of cycling in young obese women

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 16-25

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0137-5

关键词

bicycle ergometer; exercise; oxygen uptake; mechanical efficiency; obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the difference in the energy cost of submaximal cycling between normal weight ( NW) and obese ( OB) females, nine OB ( age 23.2 years +/- 1.6 SE, BMI 40.4 +/- 1.2 kg/m(2)) and nine NW ( age 25.6 years +/- 1.8, BMI 21.7 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) healthy young women were studied during a graded bicycle ergometer test at 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 W. At rest and at all workloads, oxygen uptake ((V) over dot O-2) was higher in OB than in NW women ( Student's t test, P< 0.05 - 0.01), as well as respiratory quotient during all exercise levels ( P< 0.05 - 0.01), while similar values of heart rate, pulmonary ventilation and breathing efficiency were found between the two groups. Maximal (V) over dot O-2 and anaerobic threshold were higher in OB women, and they also explained the higher oxygen pulse observed during submaximal exercise, but no difference was found when the values were adjusted for fat-free mass. While net mechanical efficiency (ME) was significantly lower in OB (ANOVA, P< 0.05), delta ME was similar in both groups, indicating no substantial derangement of muscle intrinsic efficiency in obesity, but suggesting that the increased mass of body segments involved in cycling movements may be chiefly responsible for the higher energy cost of this type of exercise. Comparison of the actual (V) over dot O-2 presently measured with that predicted by available cycle ergometry equations at the different workloads indicated inaccuracy of various degrees ranging from 8.4 to - 31.9%. It is concluded that the lower mechanical efficiency displayed by obese women in cycling has to be taken into account when prescribing exercise through methods predicting the metabolic load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据