4.5 Article

Insulin regulates islet α-cell function by reducing KATP channel sensitivity to adenosine 5′-triphosphate inhibition

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 147, 期 5, 页码 2155-2162

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-1249

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucose regulates pancreatic islet alpha-cell glucagon secretion directly by its metabolism to generate ATP in alpha-cells, and indirectly via stimulation of paracrine release of beta-cell secretory products, particularly insulin. How the cellular substrates of these pathways converge in the alpha-cell is not well known. We recently reported the use of the MIP-GFP (mouse insulin promoter-green fluorescent protein) mouse to reliably identify islet alpha-(non-green cells) and beta-cells (green cells), and characterized their ATP-sensitive K+ (K-ATP) channel properties, showing that alpha-cell K-ATP channels exhibited a 5-fold higher sensitivity to ATP inhibition than beta-cell K-ATP channels. Here, we show that insulin exerted paracrine regulation of alpha-cells by markedly reducing the sensitivity of alpha-cell K-ATP channels to ATP (IC50 = 0.18 and 0.50 mM in absence and presence of insulin, respectively). Insulin also desensitized beta-cell K-ATP channels to ATP inhibition (IC50 = 0.84 and 1.23 mM in absence and presence of insulin, respectively). Insulin effects on both islet cell KATP channels were blocked by wortmannin, indicating that insulin acted on the insulin receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling pathway. Insulin did not affect alpha-cell A-type K+ currents. Glutamate, known to also inhibit alpha-cell glucagon secretion, did not activate alpha-cell K-ATP channel opening. We conclude that a major mechanism by which insulin exerts paracrine control on alpha-cells is by modulating its KATP channel sensitivity to ATP block. This may be an underlying basis for the proposed sequential glucose-insulin regulation of alpha-cell glucagon secretion, which becomes distorted in diabetes, leading to dysregulated glucagon secretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据