4.7 Article

The latitudinal excursion of coronal magnetic field lines in response to differential rotation: MHD simulations

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 642, 期 1, 页码 L69-L72

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/504289

关键词

MHD; solar wind; Sun : activity; Sun : corona; Sun : magnetic fields

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solar energetic particles, which are believed to originate from corotating interacting regions ( CIRs) at low heliographic latitude, were observed by the Ulysses spacecraft even as it passed over the Sun's poles. One interpretation of this result is that high-latitude field lines intercepted by Ulysses connect to low-latitude CIRs at much larger heliocentric distances. The Fisk model explains the latitudinal excursion of magnetic field lines in the solar corona and heliosphere as the inevitable consequence of the interaction of a tilted dipole in a differentially rotating photosphere with rigidly rotating coronal holes. We use a time-dependent three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic ( MHD) algorithm to follow the evolution of a simple model of the solar corona in response to the differential rotation of the photospheric magnetic flux. We examine the changes of the coronal-hole boundaries, the redistribution of the line-of-sight magnetic field, and the precession of field lines in the corona. Our results confirm the basic idea of the Fisk model, that differential rotation leads to changes in the heliographic latitude of magnetic field lines. However, the latitudinal excursion of magnetic field lines in this simple tilted dipole model is too small to explain the Ulysses observations. Although coronal holes in our model rotate more rigidly than do photospheric features ( in general agreement with observations), they do not rotate strictly rigidly as assumed by Fisk. This basic difference between our model and Fisk's will be explored in the future by considering more realistic magnetic flux distributions, as observed during Ulysses polar excursions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据