4.7 Article

More sensitive and quantitative proteomic measurements using very low flow rate porous silica monolithic LC columns with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 1091-1097

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr050424y

关键词

quantitative proteomics; ion suppression; label free approach; microSPE-nanoLC-ESI-MS; silica-based monolithic column; Western blot analysis

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR18522] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS031221] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sensitivity of proteomics measurements using liquid chromatography (LC) separations interfaced with electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) improves approximately inversely with liquid flow rate (for the columns having the same separation efficiency, linear velocity, and porosity), making attractive the use of smaller inner diameter LC columns. We report the development and initial application of 10 mu m i.d. silica-based monolithic LC columns providing more sensitive proteomics measurements. A 50-mu m-i.d. micro solid-phase extraction precolumn was used for ease of sample injection and cleanup prior to the reversed-phase LC separation, enabling the sample volume loading speed to be increased by similar to 50-fold. Greater than 10-fold improvement in sensitivity was obtained compared to analyses using more conventional capillary LC, enabling e.g. the identification of > 5000 different peptides by MS/MS from 100-ng of a Shewanella oneidensis tryptic digest using an ion trap MS. The low nL/min LC flow rates provide more uniform responses for different pepticles, and provided improved quantitative measurements compared to conventional separation systems without the use of internal standards or isotopic labeling. The improved sensitivity allowed LC-MS measurements of immunopurified protein phosphatase 5 that were in good agreement with quantitative Western blot analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据