4.3 Article

Vitamin E increases the risk of developing heart failure after myocardial infarction: results from the GISSI-Prevenzione trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 347-350

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000223257.09062.17

关键词

heart failure; vitamins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Although results from basic science suggested a protective role of vitamin E treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, recent evidence indicates increased cardiovascular mortality due to vitamin E treatment. Recently, the HOPE trial showed an increment of the incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients treated with vitamin E. Methods We explored the effect of vitamin E on development of CHF in 8415 postinfarction patients without CHF at baseline, with an echocardiographic measure of left ventricular ejection fraction, who have been followed up for 3.5 years in the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. CHF during follow-up was defined as hospitalization or death for CHF. Cox regression models adjusted for relevant prognostic indicators were fitted. Results Main clinical characteristics were balanced in the 4202 and 4213 patients allocated vitamin E and control group, respectively. During follow-up, 220 patients (2.6%) developed CHF. Patients allocated vitamin E had a nonsignificant 20% (95% confidence intervals 0.92-1.56, P = 0.18) increased risk of developing CHF. Vitamin E treatment, however, was associated with a significant 50% increase ( 95% confidence intervals 1.03-2.20, P = 0.034) of CHF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction ( ejection fraction < 50%). Conclusions Our results confirm and extend previous evidence on the possible harmful effect of vitamin E on ventricular function in patients with cardiovascular disease. Available evidence should discourage the use of vitamin E in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Med 7: 347-350 (C) 2006 Italian Federation of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据