4.6 Article

Detection of vegetation abundance change in the alpine tree line using multitemporal Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 36, 期 18, 页码 4683-4701

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1088675

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang A&F University's Research and Development Fund [2013FR052]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration at Zhejiang AF University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of alpine tree line change using pixel-based approaches on medium spatial resolution imagery is challenging because of very slow tree sprawl without obvious boundaries. However, vegetation abundance or density in the tree line zones may change over time and such a change may be detected using subpixel-based approaches. In this research, a linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA)-based approach was used to examine alpine tree line change in the Northern Tianshan Mountains located in Northwestern China. Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery was unmixed into three fraction images (i.e. green vegetation - GV, shade, and soil) using the LSMA approach. The GV and soil fractions at different years were used to examine vegetation abundance change based on samples in the alpine tree line. The results show that Picea schrenkiana abundance around the top of the forested area increased approximately by 18.6% between 1990 and 2010, but remained stable in the central forest region over this period. Juniperus sabina abundance around the top of the forested area, in the central scrub region, and at the top of the scrub region increased approximately by 19.3%, 8.2%, and 15.6%, respectively. The increased vegetation abundance and decreased soil abundance of both P. schrenkiana and J. sabina indicate vegetation sprawl in the alpine tree line between 1990 and 2010. This research will be valuable for better understanding the impacts of climate change on vegetation change in the alpine tree line of central Asia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据