4.7 Article

In vitro release by Aspergillus fumigatus of galactofuranose antigens, 1,3-β-D-glucan, and DNA, surrogate markers used for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 1711-1718

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1711-1718.2006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aspergillus markers are becoming increasingly important for the early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. The kinetics of release of these surrogate markers, however, is largely unknown. We investigated the release of beta-(1-5)-galactofuranosyl (galf) antigens (Platelia Aspergillus), 1,3-beta-D-glucan (BG) (Fungitell), and DNA (PCR) in an in vitro model of Aspergillus fumigatus. The results showed that release is correlated to the growth phase of (he fungus, which depends on available nutrients. Whereas galf antigens and BG are released during logarithmic growth, DNA is released only after mycelium breakdown. During early logarithmic growth, galf antigens seem to be released somewhat earlier than BG. Furthermore, galf antigen concentrations of more than 120,000 times the serum cutoff value (0.5 ng/ml) can be measured, while BG concentrations reach it value only 978 times the serum cutoff value (60 pg/ml). During lytical growth, release of galf antigens further increased to a maximum level, which depended on pH. After that, the concentration of galf antigens stayed high (pH 7.4) or decreased to zero within 4 days (pH 5.0). In contrast to galf antigens, BG concentration decreased after I day of growth. The decrease of galf components seems to be due to the enzyme beta-galactofuranosidase, which is able to destroy galf epitopes and whose activity fluctuates in the culture filtrates in parallel with galf antigen concentration. fungal DNA seems to be released only due to autolysis caused by nutrient limitation. In conclusion. several factors clearly influence the release of surrogate markers in vitro. These same factors might also play, it role at the infection site of Aspergillus disease in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据