4.6 Article

TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X sea state measurements using the XWAVE algorithm

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 36, 期 15, 页码 3890-3912

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1051630

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-resolution TerraSAR-X (TS-X) satellite, which was successfully launched in 2007, and its twin TanDEM-X (TD-X), which was launched in 2010, deliver high-quality radar images over land and ocean, for scientific and commercial applications. We present an empirical algorithm, called XWAVE, to derive significant wave height (H-s) from TS-X and TD-X data without the need for a priori information. A set of 200 TS-X/TD-X VV polarized StripMap synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are collocated with in-situ measurements from buoys in water depths over 100 m. From that data set, 100 data pairs are used for tuning and the remaining 100 are taken for validation of the algorithm. The algorithm is based on Fourier analyses of TS-X/TD-X data and with coefficients which are fitted with collocated in situ buoy wave measurements. The algorithm takes into account the dependence of H-s on incidence angle, sea surface wind speed, and wave propagation direction in relation to satellite heading. The validation results of H-s derived by the XWAVE algorithm against in situ wave measurements show good agreement with a correlation coefficient, r, of 91%, a scatter index, S-i, of 0.21, and a bias of 0.01 m. In addition, we also compare the wave peak period and peak direction derived from the SAR image spectra to those measured by buoys. Both comparisons showed good agreement, with verification results for peak period giving an r of 96% and S-i of 0.13 and those for peak direction giving an r of 95% and S-i of 0.14. Case studies are additionally shown for TS-X/TD-X acquisitions taken over different wave conditions and incidence angles, where the derived one-dimensional spectrum is compared graphically to the one derived from buoy data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据