4.7 Review

Management of infections of osteoarticular prosthesis

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01400.x

关键词

arthrodesis; chronic suppressive therapy; exchange arthroplasty; Girdlestone; long-term oral antibiotic therapy; one-stage prosthetic reimplantation; prosthesis retention; prosthetic joint infection; review; two-stage prosthetic reimplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prosthetic joint infections are an uncommon complication of joint replacement surgery, but are associated with significant morbidity and costs when they do occur. Gram-positive cocci, in particular Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, are the most commonly recovered microorganisms (>= 50% of all isolates). About 60% of prosthetic joint infections probably occur by direct contamination during the operative procedure. Certain systemic conditions in the patients, as well as foreign material, have been identified as risk factors for prosthetic joint infection. The clinical diagnosis is only certain when there are sinus tracts that reach the prosthesis or purulent secretion is obtained from joint aspiration or during open surgery. The treatment of an infected joint prosthesis must be individualised, but it generally involves both systemic antibiotics and surgical intervention. Exchange arthroplasty in one or two stages continues to be the standard approach to management. Prosthesis retention, in conjunction with debridement and prolonged (for at least 3 months) oral antibiotic therapy, can be an alternative for early postoperative or late acute haematogenous infections, when the duration of symptoms is less than 1 month, the implant is stable, and the pathogen is relatively avirulent and sensitive to an orally well absorbed antibiotic. Good results have been achieved under these conditions in staphylococcal infections with rifampin associated with quinolones and other antibiotics, e.g., cotrimoxazole, fusidic acid, and linezolid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据