4.7 Article

Persistent and reversible cardiac dysfunction among amateur marathon runners

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1079-1084

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi813

关键词

endurance sport; diastolic dysfunction; tissue Doppler

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Transient systolic and diastolic abnormalities in ventricular function have previously been documented during endurance sports. However, these described alterations may be limited by the techniques applied. We sought, using less load-dependent methods, to characterize both the extent and the chronology of the cardiac changes associated with endurance events. Methods and results Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed prior to, immediately after, and approximately 1 month after completion of the 2003 Boston Marathon in 20 amateur athletes. TTE included two-dimensional, spectral and tissue Doppler (TD) and flow propagation velocity (V-p). After completion of the marathon, global measures of left ventricular (LV) systolic function were unchanged (EF 59 +/- 6 vs. 61 +/- 4% post, P=0.14), whereas TD-derived measures of LV systolic function [septal strain -23 +/- 5 vs. -17 +/- 4%, P=0.007; septal strain rate (SR) -1.5 +/- 0.3 vs. -1.1 +/- 0.2 s(-1), P=0.007] and right ventricular (RV) systolic function (RV apical strain -33 +/- 4 vs. -27 +/- 5%, P=0.001; RV apical SR -2.4 +/- 0.7 vs. -1.8 +/- 0.5, P=0.002) were reduced. Significant changes in transmitral velocity (E/A ratio 2.0 +/- 0.5 vs.1.3 +/- 0.3, P=0.005) and TD indices of LV and RV diastolic function (E-a septal 9.5 +/- 1.8 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.2 cm/s post-marathon, P=0.01) were also observed, indicating an inherent alteration in LV relaxation. Although all indices of LV and RV systolic function had returned to normal on follow-up, there were persistent diastolic abnormalities (RV E-a, 11.5 +/- 1.5 cm/s pre-marathon vs. 10.0 +/- 1.6 cm/s follow-up, P=0.01). Conclusion Marathon running leads to transient systolic and more persistent diastolic dysfunction of both the LV and the RV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据