4.7 Article

Smoking is a strong risk factor for rheumatoid nodules in early rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 601-606

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.039172

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine whether smoking is a risk factor for rheumatoid nodules in early rheumatoid arthritis, and if so to determine the quantitative effect of smoking. Methods: From a cohort (n = 1589) in a structured programme for follow up of newly diagnosed cases of rheumatoid arthritis ( symptoms of swollen joints ( 12 months), 112 individuals with rheumatoid nodules at inclusion were identified. Nodular patients were each compared with two age and sex matched controls without nodules from the same cohort. A detailed self administered tobacco use questionnaire was answered by 210 patients (63%). Results: Seventy patients were current smokers, 71 former smokers, and 69 had never smoked. Current smoking and former smoking were more common in patients with rheumatoid nodules compared with controls (86% v 59%) in both sexes. Positive rheumatoid factor (RF) was found more often among cases with nodules than controls (78% v 64%). Using detailed information from the questionnaires with conditional logistic regression analyses, ever having smoked was associated with an increased risk of the presence of rheumatoid nodules ( odds ratio ( OR) = 7.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 23.6); p = 0.001). The risk of having nodules was not obviously dose dependent when smoking duration as well as smoking amount were examined. A stratified analysis showed that only RF positive smokers had an increased risk of rheumatoid nodules. Smoking was associated with rheumatoid nodules among both men ( p = 0.006) and women ( p = 0.001). Tobacco use other than smoking ( n = 31) was not associated with an increased risk of nodules ( OR = 0.8 (0.2 to 3.4); p = 0.813). Conclusions: There is a strong association between smoking and rheumatoid nodules in early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据