4.6 Article

Endurance training reduces circulating inflammatory markers in persons at risk of coronary events: Impact on plaque stabilization?

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 186, 期 1, 页码 160-165

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.06.047

关键词

prospective clinical study; endurance exercise; atherosclerosis; chemotaxis; matrix metalloproteinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory pathways are involved in destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. We assessed the hypothesis that endurance training decreases circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers in persons with coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs). Thirty-two subjects with CAD and/or CVRFs joined a 12-week supervised endurance training. We found a significant decrease of the chemokines interleukin (IL)-8 (pre: 3.9 +/- 0.6, change: -1.2 +/- 0.4 pg/ml, -21%, p = 0.002) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (pre: 213 9, change: -20.4 +/- 8.2 pg/ml, -5%, p = 0.03). Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly influenced changes of IL-8 (P = 0.002). IL-8 Substantially dropped by 39% in diabetics. Moreover, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) highly significantly decreased in response to training (pre: 750 +/- 98, change: -278 +/- 77 ng/ml, -18%, p = 0.005). Exercise-induced changes of MMP-9 were influenced by concomitant use of statins (p = 0.038). We observed a particularly strong MMP-9 reduction of 44% in patients treated with statins. Acute phase reactants IL-6 (pre: 1.7 +/- 0.3, change: +0.25 +/- 0.7 pg/ml, +4%, p = 0.58) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (pre: 2.1 +/- 0.5, change: -0.25 +/- 0.4 mgA, -9%, p = 0.54) did not change in response to training. In conclusion, endurance training decreased circulating chemokines and MMP-9, which may in part explain its beneficial effect on coronary risk. Patients with DM or treated with statins because of hypercholesterolemia may particularly take advantage. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据