4.6 Article

Diagnostic yield of advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy, according to indications: An investigation from the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID)

期刊

ENDOSCOPY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 449-455

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925227

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Study Aims: The factors that more accurately predict the detection of colorectal cancers and adenomas at colonoscopy are different. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate which indications were most closely associated with advanced colorectal neoplasm (CRN), including colorectal cancer, in a group of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: The 17468 patients were enrolled in this study between July 2003 and March 2004, from 11 tertiary medical centers in Korea. They were recruited according to 11 itemized colonoscopic indications. The term advanced adenoma refers here to tubular adenomas of diameter of 11 mm or more, or to tubulovillous, villous, or severely dysplastic adenomas, irrespective of their size. Cancer was defined as the invasion of malignant cells beyond the muscularis mucosa. Advanced CRN was defined as advanced adenoma or invasive cancer. Results: Advanced CRN was found in 1227/17307 patients (1176 advanced adenomas plus 51 carcinomas, 7.1%). According to univariate and multivariate analysis, the factors associated with advanced CRN included age > 60 years (odds ratio (OR) 2.1,95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.4, P < 0.0001), male gender (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.7-2.7, P < 0.0001), referral for colonoscopy from primary care physician (OR 3.1, 95%CI 2.5-3.7, P < 0.0001), and several other indications (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.3, P < 0.001). The yield of colonoscopy for advanced CRN was lower (2.2%) than expected in patients with iron-deficiency anemia (OR 0.5, 95 %CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Age, gender, and referral for colonoscopy from primary care physician constituted important independent predictors of advanced CRN in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据