4.5 Article

Multivariate analysis of integrated and full-resolution 1H-NMR spectral data from complex pharmaceutical preparations:: St. John's wort

期刊

PLANTA MEDICA
卷 72, 期 6, 页码 556-563

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-931567

关键词

St. John's wort; NMR spectroscopy; pattern recognition; principal component analysis; data reduction; quality control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial herbal preparations are typically very complex mixtures and the relationship between content of various constituents and pharmacological action of the formulation is usually unclear. Such formulations are nevertheless standardized using a single marker constituent or a group of closely related constituents, which provides no information about other abundant constituents present in the extract. In this study, principal component analysis of 600 MHz H-1-NMR spectra of extracts of commercial formulations of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), acquired in methanol-d(4) and DMSO-d(6), was shown to be able to discriminate between various preparations according to their global composition, including differentiation between various batches from the same supplier, while no clustering into classes of tablets and capsules was observed. This suggests that the plant extract variability rather than the manufacturing process accounts for the data clustering. Major variations in the content of flavonoids, recently linked to the antidepressant activity of St. John's wort extracts, were detected. Use of two NMR solvents provided complementary data sets, allowing assessment of various aspects of sample composition from separate PCA models. Both integrated (about 200 variables) and full-resolution NMR data (about 30000 variables) have been used. The latter approach, applied for the first time in analysis of a herbal preparation, provided via loading plots more precise information about constituents responsible for data clustering, and may be generally preferable for PCA analysis of NMR data of plant extracts and herbal medicines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据