4.7 Article

Six new cellulose synthase genes from Eucalyptus are associated with primary and secondary cell wall biosynthesis

期刊

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 545-556

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/26.5.545

关键词

(1 -> 4)-beta-D-glatcan; Arabidopsis; CesA; irregular xylem; irx; Oryza; Populus; quantitative RT-PCR; wood; xylem; xylogenesis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher plants contain a family of cellulose synthase catalytic subunit (CesA) genes that encode components of an enzyme complex embedded in the cell membrane. Recent studies in several higher plant species have demonstrated that two groups of CesA genes exist, associated with either primary or secondary cell wall deposition. We cloned six full-length CesA cDNAs from Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden (EgCesAl through 6) and determined their expression patterns in a variety of organs from an adult tree. The six EgCesA genes encode predicted proteins of 978 to 1097 amino acid residues, each of which contains all of the key regions and motifs characteristic of functional CESA proteins. The predicted proteins share limited amino acid identity with each other, ranging from 61 to 70%. In contrast, similar CESA proteins from higher plant species exhibit 81 to 90% identity with the six EgCESAs. Gene expression analysis using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction indicated that transcripts of EgCesAl to 3 were abundant in tissues enriched with cells laying down secondary cell walls (e.g., xylem), but were weakly expressed in tissues undergoing primary growth (e.g., unfolding leaves). Expression of EgCesA4 and EgCesA5 was upregulated in tissues rich in rapidly dividing cells undergoing primary wall synthesis, whereas EgCevA6 was weakly expressed in all tissues analyzed. These results suggest that Eucalyptus, like other higher plants, expresses two contrasting groups of apparently co-regulated CesAs involved in either primary or secondary cell wall biosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据